What would a world look like without Twitter?

A banner with the Twitter logo in New York, November 7, 2013. (©AFP/Archives/EMMANUEL DUNAND)

The future of the social network in the blue bird appears uncertain after a week as chaotic as the previous ones, between the new bleeding of workers and the restoration of Donald Trump’s account, a possible source of controversy. One question comes up more and more regularly: what would a world look like without Twitter?

With around 237 million daily users at the last tally, at the end of June, Twitter is more modest than Facebook (1.98 billion), TikTok (more than a billion), but also Snapchat ( 363 million).

However, in just 15 years, the platform has become an important place for leaders, companies, celebrities and media, who are sometimes content with this channel to communicate.

Twitter is “no need”, launched, in his account, Steven Cohn, businessman in New York. “The world would be fine without Twitter,” he insists, convinced, like others, that the nation of tweets is just a microcosm, with limited real significance.

“Most tweets come from 1%” of users, he wrote. “Most normal people don’t log on. »

On the contrary, for Karen North, professor at USC Annenberg University, “the really strong thing about Twitter is that anyone can express something there that everyone can see”.

In the event of a conflict, a social movement, a wave of repression, “Twitter has become a central platform to report the truth of what is happening on the ground”, estimates Charles Lister, of the think tank Middle East Institute, in Washington.

Videos: currently on Actu

Like most other social networks, Twitter is also used to spread propaganda and misinformation. The company developed moderation tools to deal with this, but their sustainability is in question after the departure of more than two-thirds of the teams.

A study published in 2018 showed that false information spread there faster than verified information.

“It is unrealistic to imagine a platform where disinformation is impossible,” tempers Charles Lister. “To see information, right and wrong, disappear”, including the eventual dissolution of Twitter, “is, by definition, a bad thing. »

“Authoritarian leaders or anyone who doesn’t want to share information could benefit from a world without Twitter,” said Arizona State University professor Mark Hass.

“Source of Life”

“It’s terrible for journalism,” added Karen North. Because “Twitter is not a social network”, he said, “it is a network of news and information, the meeting place where journalists go to update themselves, to find an idea for a topic , a source or a citation. »

With the reductions in staff and the reduction in budgets that the press has experienced for more than a decade, “there are no longer enough resources to find resources in the field”, argues the academic.

Another bad effect, according to him, “without Twitter, the people who will have access to the media are the people who are important for the press to listen to them. On Twitter, anyone can tell a story. »

The Twitter logo and a photo of Elon Musk on a smartphone screen, Oct. 4, 2022, in Washington.
The Twitter logo and a photo of Elon Musk on a smartphone screen, Oct. 4, 2022, in Washington. (©AFP/Archives/OLIVIER DOULIERY)

Another function of this collaborative space, “Twitter has become an important source of information, advice, mutual help during hurricanes, forest fires, wars, terrorist attacks or epidemics”, tweeted Caroline Orr, researcher at the University of Maryland.

“It’s not something that can replace existing platforms,” ​​he warned.

There is no obvious alternative

“Facebook has things, but it’s a little old,” says Charles Lister.

“Twitter’s competitors will undoubtedly regain users”, predicts Mark Hass, citing the social network Mastodon, “but they will probably remain niches. None of them will be the public square that Twitter seeks to create . »

He believes more in the potential of the community site Reddit, like Karen North, where this social network is still limited, as it says, by its minimalist and sparse presentation, without comparing the ease of using a Twitter.

“I don’t believe there’s anything today that offers the same added value as Twitter,” Charles Lister said.

“Can it be replicated? Of course,” he said, “but that would require enormous resources and a significant timeframe. »

Source: © 2022 AFP

Was this article helpful to you? Note that you can follow Actu in the My Actu space. With one click, after registration, you can see all the news of your favorite cities and brands.

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *